Exploratory-cumulative vs. Disputational Talk on Cognitive Dependency of Translation Studies: Intermediate level students in focus

Document Type: Research Paper


1 Department of English, Isfahan (Khorasgan Branch), Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran

2 English Department, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran


The present study set out to determine the effect of implementing exploratory-cumulative talk in comparison to disputational talk on cognitive (meaning development and organization of thought as well as problem solving ability) dependency of intermediate level students in translation studies. In order to achieve the objectives of the study, a quasi-experimental-pretest-posttest-statistical study was conducted in which 63 linguistically homogeneous B.A students in translation studies at the IAU-Shahreza branch, in experimental and control groups were the participants. Administering cognitive dependency questionnaire before and after implementing the treatment, exploratory-cumulative talk, helps the researcher to find out the possible effect of it against the control group, disputational talk, in translator training courses. The results of the data analysis indicate that the difference between the posttest mean scores of the experimental and control groups do not reach statistical significance. However, by conventional criteria, the difference between the pretest and posttest scores of the experimental group was considered statistically significant by large effect size. The application of the present study findings in translator training courses may pave the way for translation teachers and translation students to follow more fruitful approaches.


Alexander, R. (2014). Dialogic Teaching Essentials. Singapore: National Institute of Education.
Aviv, C. (2018). The Role of Pedagogical Mentoring in Telecollaboration. Wiley Online Libearary
Bandura A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. NJ; Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs.
Barnes, D. Todd, F. (2005). Communication and Learning Revisited Making Meaning Through Talk. Porthsmouth, NH.: Boynton/Cook Pub.
Barnes, H. (1969). Language, the Learner, and the School. London: Penguin Books.
Barnes, D. Todd, F. (1996). Why Talk Is Important. English Teaching-Practice and Critique, 9(2), 7-10.
Bender (2018).Testing Multiple Goal Models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 706–722.
Birjandi, P., Gorjian, B., Molonia, Sh. (2009). Political Text Translation. Rahnama Publication.
Bowskill, D. (2010). Achievement goals over time: How predict deep knowledge. European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction.
Bransford, J. D. (2012). Rethinking Transfer: A Simple Proposal with Multiple Implications. Review of Research in Education, 24, 61–100.
Brevig, L. (2016). Engaging in Retrospective Reflection. Reading Teacher, 59(6), 522-630.
Britton, J. (1970). Language and learning: Allen Lane London.
Brown, A. C. (2017). Classroom Community And Discourse: How Argumentation Emerges During A Socratic Circle. Dialogic Pedagogy, 4.
Bruffee, K. A. (2017).Cooperative Learning Versus Collaborative Learning. Magazine of Higher Learning, 27(1), 12-18.
Cohen, J (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Coultas, V. (2012). Case Studies of Teachers' Understandings of The Pedagogy of Classroom Talk: Some Critical Moments Explored. Literacy, 50(1), 32-39.
Dawes, L., Mercer, N. (2008). The quality of talk at the computer. Language and Learning, 22-25.
Edwards, A. D. Westgate, D. P. (2015). Investigating classroom talk (Vol. 13). London: Falmer Press.
Enghag, M., Gustafsson, P., Jonsson, G. (2017). From Everyday Life Experiences to Physics Understanding Occurring in Small Group Work With Context Rich Problems During Introductory Physics Work At University. Research in Science Education, 37(4), 449-467.
Enghag, M., Gustafsson, P., Jonsson, G. (2019). Talking Physics during Small-Group Work with Context-Rich Problems - Analyzed from an Ownership Perspective. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(3), 455-472.
Garrison, S. (2019). Topic-Oriented Teaching. Dialogues in Amsterdam, 39, (p.101-114).
Golanics, J. D., Nussbaum, E. M. (2018). Enhancing online collaborative argumentation through question elaboration and goal instructions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(3), 167-180.
Haavind, S. (2019). An Interpretative Model of Key Heuristics That Promote Collaborative Dialogue among Online Learners. Online Learning 11(3).
Harasim, H. (2015). The sociology of the classroom. In A. Hartnett (Ed.), The Social Sciences In Educational Studies (pp. 33–45). London: Heinemann.
Harris, R. Ratcliffe, M. (2005). Socio-Scientific Issues and the Quality of Exploratory Talk- What can be learned from Schools Involved in a "Collapsed Day" Project. Curriculum Journal, 16(4), 439-453.
Higgins. G. (2011). Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons.
Howe, A. (1992). A Climate for Small Group Talk, in M. Brubacher, R. Payne & P. Rickett (Eds). Perspectives on Small Group Learning: Theory and Practice. Ontario: Rubicon Publishing.
Jensen, D. H. (2016). Arguing to learn: Design justifications and guidelines. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(4), 439-457.
Kaplan. K., Saccuzzo, j. (2017). Promote Conceptual Understanding. Social Science Research Unit: Institute of Education, University of London.
Kerawalla,l. N., Petrou, S., Scanlon, D. (2013). An Introduction to an Analytic Framework. Learning and Instruction, 9, 449–473
Khazaee Far, A. (2017). Literary Text Translation. SAMT Publications.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2012). Recognizing, Doing and Seeing. New York: Routledge.
Kunda, B. M. (2019). Does Output Promote Noticing And Second Language Acquisition? TESOL Quarterly, 34.
Littleton, K. Mercer, N. (2013). Interthinking: Putting talk to work. London: Routledge.
Lynn, E. (2014). Emergent Leadership in Children’s Discussion Groups. Cognition and Instruction, 25(1).
Mercer, N. (1995). The Guided Construction of Knowledge: Talk amongst Teachers and Learners. Bristol: Multilingual matters.
Mercer, N. (2000). The Quality of Talk in Children's Collaborative Activity in the Classroom. Learning and Instruction, 6(4), 359-377.
Mercer, N. (2009). Sociocultural Discourse Analysis. Journal of applied linguistics, 1(2), 137- 168.
Mercer, N. (2011). The Analysis of Classroom Talk: Methods and Methodologies. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(1), 1-14.
Mercer, N., Hodgkinson, H. (2008). Words And Minds: How We Use Language To Think Together. London: Routledge.
Mercer, N., Littleton, K (2017). Interthinking: Putting talk to work. Abingdon, Oxon, UK: Routledge.
Robins, G. (2011). The Effect of Exploratory Talk on the Development of Sentence Structure in Able Writers. Literacy, 45(2), 78-83.
Rojas-Drummond, S., Zapata, M. P. (2014). Exploratory Talk, Argumentation and Reasoning in Mexican Primary School Children. Language and Education, 18(6), 539-557.
Rojas-Drummond, S., Torreblanca, O., Pedraza, H., Velez, M., Guzman, K. (2013). 'Dialogic scaffolding': Enhancing learning and understanding in collaborative contexts. Learning Culture and Social Interaction, 2(1), 11-21.
Rutter, T., Edwards, R., Dean, P. (2016). Who's That Talking in My Class? What Does Research Say about Pupil to Pupil Exploratory Talk That Leads To Learning? Teacher Education Advancement Network Journal, 8(1), 22-32.
Soter, A. O. (2018). What The Discourse Tells Us: Talk And Indicators Of High-Level Comprehension. International Journal of Educational Research, 47(6), 372-391.
Sutherland, J. (2006). Promoting Group Talk and Higher-Order Thinking in Pupils by "Coaching" Secondary English Trainee Teachers. Literacy, 40(2), 106-114.
Topping, K. J. Trickey, S. (2014). The Role of Dialog in Philosophy for Children. International Journal of Educational Research, 63, 69-78.
T'Sas, J. (2018). Learning Outcomes of Exploratory Talk in Collaborative Activities. Unpublished PhD dissertation, university of Antwerp.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Mental Process. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Walls, F. (2009). Challenging Task-Driven Pedagogies of Mathematics. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. Building Connections: Research, Theory and Practice, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Webb, P. (2016). From Exploratory Talk to Abstract Reasoning: a Case for Far Transfer? Educational psychology review, 1-17.
Wegerif, R., Mercer, N. Dawes, L. (2009). Software design to support discussion in the primary curriculum. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 14(3), 199-211.